1.) crystallization is when you give voting issues. you tell the judge plain up what arguments you won and why they make you the round winner 2.) VIs should be arguments because they are claims with warrants; ideas are just concepts 3.) the 2AR should respond to neg VIs and offer some of their own
1) Crystalization is the time of the speech when the voting issues are offered. 2)Arguments are used because they have a claim , warrants and can be tied back to the V and vc. This is goal.. to bring it all back to the value and the big picture. 3) a successful 2nr will offer voting issues and rebuke those offered by the neg. This tells the judge why you should win and brings it all together.
1)Crystallization is clearing up the argument and use your voting issues. 2)Voting Issues should be arguments because an argument has a claim and ideas are just like an idea. 3)2AR should answer to the aff and make their voting issues.
1.Crystallization is a summary of all the important arguments in the debate. you are clearing up and putting all the arguments together for the judge. 2.you want the voting issues to have impact, claim, warrant, and link to the criterion, not just be your own thoughts 3. the 2ar should respond to the neg voting issues and include some of your own
-When you state your voting issues. It's a time to clear all the arguments up for the judge so they can make their decision. -Ideas are very broad concepts while arguments have a warrant and impact on the criterion. Arguments start with ideas they just have a lot more support in their structure. -Respond to the neg's voting issues and provide your own.
-crystillization- clearing up the arguments in the debate so the judge can make a fianl decision.
-voting issues should be arguments not ideas becuase arguements are claims, warrants, and connections to the criterion, an idea is jus a topic, or concept. The voting issues need to be clearly connected to the criteria.
-the 2AR should respond to the neg voting issues and make their own.
6 comments:
1.) crystallization is when you give voting issues. you tell the judge plain up what arguments you won and why they make you the round winner
2.) VIs should be arguments because they are claims with warrants; ideas are just concepts
3.) the 2AR should respond to neg VIs and offer some of their own
1) Crystalization is the time of the speech when the voting issues are offered.
2)Arguments are used because they have a claim , warrants and can be tied back to the V and vc. This is goal.. to bring it all back to the value and the big picture.
3) a successful 2nr will offer voting issues and rebuke those offered by the neg. This tells the judge why you should win and brings it all together.
1)Crystallization is clearing up the argument and use your voting issues.
2)Voting Issues should be arguments because an argument has a claim and ideas are just like an idea.
3)2AR should answer to the aff and make their voting issues.
1.Crystallization is a summary of all the important arguments in the debate. you are clearing up and putting all the arguments together for the judge.
2.you want the voting issues to have impact, claim, warrant, and link to the criterion, not just be your own thoughts
3. the 2ar should respond to the neg voting issues and include some of your own
-When you state your voting issues. It's a time to clear all the arguments up for the judge so they can make their decision.
-Ideas are very broad concepts while arguments have a warrant and impact on the criterion. Arguments start with ideas they just have a lot more support in their structure.
-Respond to the neg's voting issues and provide your own.
-crystillization- clearing up the arguments in the debate so the judge can make a fianl decision.
-voting issues should be arguments not ideas becuase arguements are claims, warrants, and connections to the criterion, an idea is jus a topic, or concept. The voting issues need to be clearly connected to the criteria.
-the 2AR should respond to the neg voting issues and make their own.
Post a Comment